Breaking News

Toronto Load More

OntarioLoad More

CanadaLoad More



Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The world's first pregnant man is currently trying to convince the courts that he and his wife aren't the same sex so that he can legally divorce her


Pregnant man fighting for divorce in Arizona court


PHOENIX -- He's known as the world's first pregnant man, 

but he's now facing more controversy.

Thomas and Nancy Beatie now find themselves in the 

middle of more drama. They must convince an Arizona court 

system they aren't the same sex, therefore, they should be 

granted a divorce.

Nancy remembers after Thomas got pregnant, "We had 

death threats and people knew where we lived and from a 

lot of people there was a lot of outpouring of positive."

Thomas ended up giving birth to three children during his 

marriage to Nancy. The couple eventually relocated to 

Arizona. But last year, evidence their relationship was in 

trouble was leaked to the media. 

"It was a very unhappy place for me for a few years," Nancy 

said. 

The couple are now in the midst of trying to get a divorce. 

But as Nancy's attorney explains, "Arizona just doesn't have 

a body of law or authority to work off of."

Court documents show the judge is questioning if the union 

is actually a same-sex marriage and since that's banned in 

Arizona, the judge may not be able to grant the Beaties a 

divorce. 

"Now we have to prove to the judge that we're man and 

woman, married, legally," Nancy said. 

"Thomas wants to be treated as an equal," said his attorney, 

David Michael. "He doesn't want his children to be born out 

of wedlock or that he wasn't in a valid different-sex marriage. "

Thomas began testosterone treatment in the late 90s and by 

2002, had a double mastectomy and chest reconstruction. 

He's been a man, legally, ever since. 

"Once they said Thomas was a man, he could use that for 

any other purpose, passport, driver's license, marriage 

license," Cantor explained. 

But the confusion seems to surround the fact that despite 

his sex-change operation, Thomas kept his reproductive 

organs.

"What held the judge up is wait a second, he had children, 

he didn't sterilize himself," Cantor said. 

"Did Thomas undergo a sufficient enough change to make 

him now a male and then, of course, the giving birth part 

factored into that," Higgins explained. 

According to Superior Court records, "it appears, by any 

reasonable standard, Thomas was the biological mother at 

the times his children were born." 

"Under the dictionary definition of having child-bearing 

organs, that makes him a female by definition, but that's not 

the definition that the law looks at," Cantor said.

Thomas' attorney argues most transgender people don't 

become sterile, so it can't be used as a measurement of a 

successful sex change.

"Only 21 percent of female-to-male transsexuals actually get 

a hysterectomy," Cantor said. "That means 80 percent keep 

their reproductive organs."

"I think that this point, there is plenty of authority to back up 

our position," Higgins said. 

Nancy  is in a better place now. She simply wants to be 

mom to Susan, Austin and Jensen and close this chapter.

"I'm just standing up for the truth and what's right and I'm 

doing the right thing," she said. "I want this divorce and I 

want him to move on with his life and I want to move on with 

mine."

The Beaties are scheduled to make their next court 

appearance on Thursday. 
Share This
Blogger
Facebook
Disqus

comments powered by Disqus

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe
Stay Connected
Featured

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

© The Toronto Post All rights reserved