Breaking News

Toronto Load More

OntarioLoad More

CanadaLoad More



Saturday, March 02, 2013

University of Ottawa Racism, Censorship and Abuse of Power




In June 2008, Allan Rock 
became university president. 
He’s a former Canadian 
politician and UN 
ambassador. He’s a pro-
Israeli flack. He supports its 
worst crimes.

by Stephen Lendman


His administration is unprincipled. It’s marked by secrecy, political 
censorship, abuse of power, and repudiation of fundamental 
university values.
He targets academic and speech freedoms. He violates Canadian 
law.
Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 
states:
“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression,including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.”
Article 7 assures “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security 
of person and the right not to be deprived thereof in accordance 
with the principles of fundamental justice.”
Hardline rule is university policy. What Rocks says goes. Faculty 
and student activists are targeted, vilified, persecuted, suspended 
and dismissed.
Marc Kelly was an exemplary student. In October 2008, he was 
deregistered, expelled for a semester, and prevented from 
completing his final three courses to graduate.
His legitimate research was rejected. He was never contacted or 
questioned. He was targeted for supporting tenured Professor Denis 
Rancourt.
In September 2008, Rock got the Executive Committee of the 
Board of Governors (EBOG) to suspend him. In December, he 
recommended dismissing him. He wanted him barred him from 
campus.
In March 2009, he fired him. He targeted his principled activism. 
He supports Palestinian rights. He does so honorably. Rock cited 
his creative teaching methods. They deserve praise, not 
condemnation.
Rancourt is a distinguished physics professor. He’s an expert in his 
field. He’s a respected environmental science researcher. Students 
called him a “phenomenal teacher.” His pedagogical methods work. 
Student achievement proved it.
Rock’s game plan was get Rancourt. He fired him for supporting 
right over wrong. He couldn’t do so for legitimate reasons. 
Contrived ones were invented. His teaching methods had nothing to 
do with it.
Rock ordered campus police to bar him from campus. Orders said 
remove him if he shows up. That’s how despots operate. Rock runs 
U of O more like a police state than university. Education and 
learning suffer.
U of O Law Professor Joanne St. Lewis is complicit. She colluded 
with Rock. She did so against Rancourt. She sued him for $1 
million. She charged racism. Doing so was spurious.
Her relationship with Rock is unprincipled. Rancourt called her his 
“house negro.” He did so for good reason. He cited Malcolm X. In 
1963, Malcolm first used the term.
St. Lewis had no justification to sue. Rock put her up to it. U of O 
pays her legal expenses. Rancourt’s on his own. He’s up against 
two of Canada’s largest law firms.
He’s holding his own. He’s doing so with limited finances. His U of 
O Watch blog posts regular updates. It includes other vital postings.
It has information on his legal fund. Since 2009, he’s been 
nonsalaried. Litigation drained his savings. He appreciates whatever 
help readers can afford. It’s for a good cause. It supports his 
struggle for justice. It’s about right over wrong.
U of O is a hotbed of racist autocratic extremism. Rock made it that 
way. A November 2011 lawsuit said so. A January 2012 press 
release explained.
Foreign medical students face systemic discrimination. Medical 
residents sued for damages. Their fundamental rights were violated.
They charged conspiracy to injure, public office malfeasance, 
defamation, intimidation, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, 
breach of contract, U of O liability for negligence and breach of 
contract, vicarious liability, and violations of the 1990 Human 
Rights Code.
Rock and St. Lewis are equal opportunity offenders. Hazel Gashoka 
is targeted. In 2012, she earned a U of O honors BA. She’s a 
Wilfrid Laurier University graduate student.
She’s Black. She’s a social justice activist. At U of O, she was a 
university senate representative. She learned about campus racism 
firsthand. Student union members reported it.
It drew public attention. Rock and other university administrators 
were embarrassed. St. Lewis was enlisted to help.
She’s Black. She teaches civil liberties, social justice, comparative 
South African and Canadian constitutional law, critical race theory, 
history of legal thought, and criminal justice administration.
She co-chaired the Canadian Bar Association Working Group on 
Racial Equality.
She addressed accusations of campus racism. Whitewash 
substituted for honest assessment. She called charges exaggerated. 
Doing so ignored prima facie evidence.
She alleged “significant methodological errors.” She cited an 
“apparent lack of understanding of the administrative processes of 
the university.”
She claimed it showed a “complete failure to conduct a systemic 
analysis in support of its conclusions of systemic racism.”
She said at most a miniscule percent of U of O’s population too 
small to matter is affected. Doing so ignored systematic racist 
abuse.
Rancourt criticized her assessment. So did Gashoka. She made a 
six-minute YouTube video. She said St. Lewis ran cover for Rock.
notice of libel followed. It threatens suing for defamation. 
Attorney Richard Dearden sent it. He’s senior litigation partner in 
Gowlings’ Ottawa office. It’s one of Canada’s largest law firms.
It demanded Gashoka “immediately take down (her) defamatory 
video from (her) website and any other location it has been 
published.”
It demanded she suppress truth. She was “advised to preserve and 
maintain all records and communication….regarding the production 
and publication of (her) video.”
Gashoka went public. On February 11, she addressed Rock and U 
of O senate members. “Does the University of Ottawa plan on 
funding a lawsuit against me,” she asked? She entitled to know.
In November 2012, she advised St. Lewis of her video. She posted 
it on her blog. She requested comments or corrections. No response 
followed.
Weeks later, a notice of libel arrived. Her open letter responded. 
“Please confirm that the University of Ottawa will not be funding a 
defamation lawsuit against me,” she requested.
She included links to her video and notice of libel. Rancourt calls it 
“morally wrong for (U of O) and St. Lewis to try to silence” her.
“Using public funds and student tuition money to fund repressive 
litigation against her would be ironic, as the university claims to 
promote discourse and debate on matters of public interest.”
Canadian law affirms free expression and opinion. Gashoka is 
entitled to express her views freely. St. Lewis has no right to expect 
immunity from justifiable criticism.
Rancourt “call(ed) on (Rock) to state publicly, without further 
delay, that the university will not fund a lawsuit against (Gashoka) 
for her video, and to clarify the university’s criteria for funding 
lawsuits against its critics.”
Gashoka announced a February 27 press conference. Media 
representatives and other interested parties are invited to attend. 
It’s scheduled for 11AM at U of O’s Rotunda of Tabaret Hall.
She’ll address her video, litigation threat, St. Lewis’ U of O racism 
dismissiveness, and related issues.

A Final Comment
Rancourt’s new book addresses racism. It’s titled “Hierarchy and 
Cynthia McKinney praised the book. It “turn(s) the entire notion of 
RACISM on its head,” she said.
At the same time, it “exposes racist acts committed by others to 
deflect that characterization from sticking at the highest levels of 
The Academy.”
“North American civil rights defenders need this book,” she added.
“Rancourt’s deeply incisive Fight Against Racism brings us back to 
the reality of the struggle, away from the manoeuvering for class 
advantage and away from the victim’s desire to create illusions of 
state-given justice.”
Rancourt asks key questions. They need to be raised. Billions of 
people are dehumanized. Censorship conceals it.
America lost all earlier civil rights gains. Canada appears no better. 
Things now are worse than ever. Michelle Alexander’s book “The 
addressed it.
She calls today’s Jim Crow a modern-day racial caste system. 
Elitists designed it. They embrace colorblindness. They claim poor 
Blacks are dangerous and economically superfluous.
America’s gulag is an instrument of control. Lock-em-up to do so. 
America’s most vulnerable are grossly mistreated.
They’re victimized by get tough on crime policies, guilt by 
accusation, three strikes and you’re out, racist drug laws, poverty, 
unemployment, and advocacy for social justice challenging 
repressive state power.
Academia is no safe haven. U of O isn’t alone. It’s one of the worst 
under Rock. Racism, censorship, abuse of power, and 
institutionalized injustice define his administration. He enforces 
what no one should tolerate.
Principled activists suffer. Struggling for justice isn’t easy. 
Constitutional rights aren’t negotiable. Rancourt, Gashoka, and 
likeminded activists won’t roll over for injustice. Nor should anyone 
else.
About the Author: Stephen Lendman who wrote the above lives in 
Chicago and can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: 
Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-
edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive 
Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 
10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All 
programs are archived for easy listening.

Share This
Blogger
Facebook
Disqus

comments powered by Disqus

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe
Stay Connected
Featured

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

© The Toronto Post All rights reserved